Thursday, May 27, 2010

Rand Paul, Rachael Madcow and the fake outrage Part 2

For some odd reason, some Republicans and some called conservatives have an overwhelming desire to reach out to the liberal infested media. When they do reach out to the media, they tend to become unknowing pawns to liberals in which they use them to attack Republicans and conservatives. The phrase "useful idiots" best describe these folks. I don't really care about what Rand Paul said on Rachael Madcow's show. Rand isn't a racist. Rand may be very intelligent when it comes to understanding the constitution and the Federal Reserve, but he isn't very smart when it comes to knowing who his enemies are. It was beyond stupid for Rand to accept Rachael Madcow's invitation to be a guest on her show last week. First off, there was nothing for him to gain by appearing on her show. MSNBC is in a long distant second place competing against Fox News, and Greta Von Susteren consistently destroys Rachel Madcow on a nightly basis in the 10pm time slot match up.. The audience that still watches MSNBC tends to be very liberal in nature, so Rand wasn't going to "convert" any of those tin foilers by appearing on her show. Also Rand was foolish not to have been aware the agenda of Rachael Madcow and MSNBC as it pertains to the Tea Party movement. MSNBC has been one of the main media outlets that has been trying desperately to discredit and smear the Tea Party activist movement since it's start last year. I've commented in detail on several occasions about MSNBC purposely hiding the racial idenity of a gentlemen in Arizona who cared an assault riffle to a Barack Obama Health Care Summit.



The MSNBC cameraman knew exactly what he was doing by hiding the idenity of the gentlemen with the riffle. MSNBC is a text book illustration of what "activist journalism" is all about



Anyone who is politically astute knows that MSNBC does not like the Tea Party movement. They despise it with a loathing. I truly question Rand Paul's lack of common sense in him not knowing that he was basically being set up by Rachael Madcow in the first place. This is what Rachael Madcow had to say about Tom Tancredo and the Tea Party folks back in February of this year.



In this video, Rachael purposely smeared Tom Tancredo as being "anti immigrant" thus implying that he is against not only illegal immigration but legal as well. Tom isn't against legal immigration only illegal immigration. This video shows the type of manipulative person Rachael Madcow is. If I was an adviser to Rand Paul a few weeks agao, and he told me about the invitation , I would have told him to "NOT" appear on Rachael's show at any cost. I would have told Rand that Rachael "WASN'T" going to try and talk about current events with him. She was going to use his libertarian ideology against him to smear him as a Tea Part racist. Since the Tea Party overwhelmingly backed Rand Paul, it is only logical that MSNBC as well as the rest of the media has a huge bull eye on Rand's forehead after he won his primary race in Kentucky. In essence, Rand Paul has been "Palinized" by the media. Palinized is the term to describe what happens to a Republican, when the media wants to destroy him or her at any cost. Just ask Sarah Palin about that. Maybe Rand didn't understand that the media especially MSNBC has it out for him, but now he knows how the liberal media game is played. Some lessons are learned the hard way. If anything, Rand could have taken a cue from D. L Hughley's useful idiot who is also known as the Republican National Committee Chairman Michael Steele on what not to do. The left can't stand the ground Rush Limbaugh walks on. Now if I was Michael Steele a year ago, would I have accepted an invitation by D.L Hughley of CNN to be interviewed on his show? The answer of course would be "NO"! I would have known that the only reason D.L Hughley would invite me on his show forty eight hours after Rush Limbaugh gave the keynote speech to the Conservative Political Action Conference is to try and sucker me into attacking Limbaugh. As I said, I wouldn't have taken the bait, because unlike Steele and Paul and others on the right, I know my enemies and I know how they think. In closing, here's Chris Mathews calling out Republicans to "denounce" Rush Limbaugh. The left is always looking for gullible useful idiots on the right. Thankfully, no Republican has yet to take Matthew's bait.

2 Comments:

Anonymous Anonymous said...

renee Even though i consider the fox news channel the most reliable news source, i'm disappointed by pseudo-conservatives like bill o'reilly and sean hannity, who routinely book characters like Al Sharpton, Alan Colmes, and Bob Beckel. Why they continue they value the opinions of these men is a mystery to me. Sadly, this is the attitude adopted by many Republicans/Conservatives today, in desperate need of validation by marginally talented and unethical liberals, who don't give a hoot about their opinons.

5:18 AM  
Blogger conservative brother said...

O'Reily considers himself an "independent" voice. He goes after the left and right. In my book O'Reily is a joke, but for some reason he's the most watched show on Fox. I can't explain why. Hannity has his moments. He is way to nice of a guy. He doesn't have that killer instinct to attack the left like Mark Levin or Michael Savage have.Your right about O'Reily and Hannity. When they book people like Sharpton, all they are doing is giving credibility to him. They rather have a black race hustling con man who is liberal on their shows as a frequent guest rather then a straight up decent honorable black conservative. Pseudo conservatives have always reached out to liberals for validation just to always have their olive branch snapped right in front of the pseudo
conservative's face. It is truly a pitiful sight to be behold.

9:15 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home